Sports

The true extent of St Kilda Saints’ dependence on the AFL revealed in financial statements

Few clubs carry much debt in 2025, largely due to the socialised variable funding model. St Kilda chief executive Carl Dilena confirmed that the club’s priorities were to maximise their football spending in “both caps” (salary cap and soft cap) and then address their financial position; effectively, they prioritised on-field progress.

“You want to reach your football spend of both caps. Then after that, we’re looking to our financial (position).”

The Saints will likely have the two highest-paid players in the competition next year, having re-signed Wanganeen-Milera on nearly $2 million per season for two years. They poached free agent Tom De Koning from Carlton on a monster deal worth an estimated $1.7m a season for eight years, in a spree that also netted Jack Silvagni from the Blues, Eagle Liam Ryan and Sam Flanders from Gold Coast.

The Saints had spent under the salary cap over the past two or three years, Dilena said, and this allowed them to spend up to 105 per cent in other seasons under the “banking” rules.

While North Melbourne now receive slightly above $1 m more than in variable funding than St Kilda, the Kangaroos did not specify their need for AFL guarantees in their financial statements because they are debt free.

Dilena said the “going concern” clause was “pretty standard” and a requirement of the auditor, but the club would prefer not to have it in their statements. “You get guaranteed by the AFL anyway.

“That’s been there forever and a day, that clause. You just have to repair your balance sheet if you like, to get that removed. We’ll get to that point.”

Dilena said that the extra $750,000 in variable funding was needed because the AFL had cut the club’s variable funding too quickly, leaving “a $2.3 million hole”.

He said the Saints had paid off all their debt to the AFL this year and there was “no specific timetable” on wiping the bank debt. “Certainly, as part of our 2030 strategy, it’ll be gone.”

Loading

In their financial statements, St Kilda’s directors said the club was “a going concern” due to a number of factors, such as the positive cash flow, net assets of $38.077 million and their forecasts for 2026.

In statements about their ability to meet debts, the Saints said:

“The group’s ability to continue as a going concern and meet its debts as and when they fall due is dependent on the group receiving continued financial support from the AFL including:

“1. The continued guarantee of the group’s borrowing facilities with Westpac totalling $6.75 million (drawn to $4.5 million at 31 October 2025). The guarantee extends to 31 January 2027.

Loading

“2. Continued support under the conditions set out in a letter of financial support provided by the AFL;

“3. Working capital capacity with the AFL enabling the group to receive periodic advances of monies to pay its creditors, should it be required; and

“In the directors’ opinion, there are reasonable grounds to believe that such funding and support will continue to be available.”

The Saints benefited, as all clubs did, from an increase in base funding from the AFL (from $14.132 million to $16.314 million), and from variable funding rising from $7.165 million to $7.915 million.

News, results and expert analysis from the weekend of sport are sent every Monday. Sign up for our Sport newsletter.

  • For more: Elrisala website and for social networking, you can follow us on Facebook
  • Source of information and images “brisbanetimes”

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button

Discover more from Elrisala

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading