“Clearly, that puts the onus on Australia and other partners in the Indo-Pacific to explain their current levels of defence spending and how they are contributing to the alliance network in the region,” Sinodinos said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese defended Australia’s defence expenditure on Friday, saying his government had already lifted investment in defence. “We’ve increased it by $57 billion over the medium term and by more than $10 billion in the short term, as well,” he said.
Anthony Albanese is still to meet Donald Trump in person.Credit: Artists
But opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said that while Australia, not the US, should determine the domestic defence spend, many of the recommendations in the 2023 Defence Strategic Review had not been funded, and should be.
“It is clear that the plan coming from that is underfunded in so many different ways,” he said.
Mike Pezzullo, the former Home Affairs department boss and author of the 2009 Defence white paper, said the prime minister was correct to say Australia should not simply pick an arbitrary percentage of GDP to set the defence budget.
But like Taylor, he said the government needed to spend more to fully fund the recommendations of the review, which it had commissioned former defence minister Stephen Smith and former Chief of the Defence Force Sir Angus Houston to write, to look at Australia’s strategic environment and advise on what investment was needed.
“My instinct is that to fully fund the DSR, the number would be 3 to 3.5 per cent of GDP,” he said, adding “I think over the decade from 2025 to 2035, we need to be on the same trajectory as our allies.”
Loading
Pezzullo nominated missile defence interceptors, mine sweeping naval vessels and defensive measures to counter swarming drone attacks – deployed by Ukraine and Israel to devastating effect in recent conflicts – as three examples of capabilities which Australia needed to spend more money on.
Charles Edel, Australia chair at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies and a former US State Department adviser, said the administration’s call to increase defence spending was in line with Australia’s own prerogative to prepare for regional security challenges.
“Preserving a favourable balance of power in the face of increasing Chinese provocations demands more robust efforts by Australia as well as the United States,” he said.
Such regional challenges will be on the agenda when Foreign Minister Penny Wong meets US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and their Indian and Japanese counterparts in Washington on July 1 for a regular gathering of the Quad group of nations.
Announced on Friday, this will be the second meeting of the four foreign ministers, following one hosted by Rubio the day after US President Donald Trump’s inauguration in January.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was quizzed after the White House reiterated calls for Asia-Pacific allies to increase military spending.Credit: Sam Mooy
“Next week’s summit builds on that momentum to advance a free, open and secure Indo-Pacific,” State Department deputy spokesman Tommy Pigott said at a regular news briefing. “This is what American leadership looks like: strength, peace and prosperity.”
Trump’s demands to substantially increase defence spending have caused friction with some allies. Last week, The Financial Times reported Japan cancelled a planned “2+2” meeting on July 1, the same day as the Quad meeting, to be attended by Rubio, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and their counterparts. Tokyo reportedly took umbrage at the US “abruptly” calling for higher defence spending.
The US Department of Defence is also conducting a snap review of the AUKUS pact between the US, Australia and the United Kingdom to ensure it is in line with Trump’s “America First” priorities. It is widely expected that the US will ask for higher defence spending as part of any renegotiated deal, and could also bring trade into the discussions.
Trump told this week’s NATO summit that Spain would be made to pay “twice as much” in trade talks because it refused to sign on to the pledge to hike military expenditure.
Other NATO countries agreed to lift “core” defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, and invest another 1.5 per cent on a broad range of defence-related measures such as improving roads, bridges, ports and airfields, countering cyber and hybrid attack measures, or preparing societies to deal with future conflicts.
Separately, Australian super funds, companies and investors will be spared a potential US tax increase buried in Trump’s flagship “One Big Beautiful Bill” after the US government agreed to strip the hidden nasty from the legislation.
Loading
Section 899 of the bill would have levied “increased rates of tax on foreign persons of discriminatory foreign countries”, starting at 5 per cent and increasing annually to as high as 20 per cent.
A number of Australian policies are considered unfair or discriminatory by the US government, making it likely Australians would have been hit by the policy.
But US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said it was no longer necessary due to an agreement with G7 nations that would defend American interests. Republican senators serving on financial committees said they agreed to remove the section from the bill.
with Penry Buckley, AP
Get a note directly from our foreign correspondents on what’s making headlines around the world. Sign up for our weekly What in the World newsletter.
