"Foreign Policy".. Netanyahu’s war strategy has no meaning
Foreign Policy magazine spoke The American newspaper, on Friday, in an article, about the conflict of “Israel’s” goals. In its war on Gaza, indicating that “Israel’s” plans It is not logical.
The writer Anchal Vora mentioned, in her article, that in November, “I met the father of the prisoner, Liri Albag, in Tel Aviv, while sitting in the middle of Begin Road holding a photo of his daughter, said that he supports the Israeli military campaign against Hamas. But it seems that Albag’s patience has run out.”
She added that in late March, in a final warning to the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, he said The prisoner’s father told the local press that the families of the prisoners will no longer organize marches, but will gather in the streets, joining an expanded anti-Netanyahu protest movement.
She pointed out that “the problem is that while the families of the prisoners see the return of their relatives and the removal of Hamas as a victory – in this order – many have known for a long time that these two goals of the war were in conflict.”
p>
The writer explained that “Netanyahu deliberately prioritized eliminating Hamas over releasing prisoners from the beginning of the military campaign, without actually having a coherent plan to achieve either thing.”
The Prime Minister faces increasing accusations from military analysts and a growing part of the Israeli public, as soon as he… Responding to the events, while lacking a vision that could end the war and free the prisoners, according to what I mentioned.
However, " “He is still dissatisfied,” according to the writer. In response to the protests, Netanyahu said that in the “moment before victory,” early elections would “paralyze” Israel. The country will only benefit Hamas. She pointed out that Netanyahu “has now set his sights on the city of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, where more than a million Palestinians have taken refuge,” noting that “any such attack will not only arouse international outrage, but will also make negotiations with Hamas more difficult.” ;. The article pointed out that, “Shortly after the Hamas attack on October 7, Netanyahu declared war. The basic message addressed to the families of the prisoners was that bombing Gaza would put pressure on Hamas to release the prisoners, while at the same time eliminating Hamas.”
He explained that Netanyahu “avoided more fundamental questions about how exactly he intends to eliminate Hamas, which enjoys massive popular support.” Not only inside Gaza and other Palestinian territories, but also at bases in Lebanon, Syria, Iran and elsewhere.”
According to the threat assessment Annually collected by US intelligence, “Israel” may face… Years of resistance from Hamas, an assessment supported by two senior Israeli security officials, who spoke to Foreign Policy magazine. The writer wondered: “Even if the Israeli forces were able, after years of fighting, to destroy Hamas in Gaza, what about its incarnation in the future?” Even if the Israeli army was able to destroy Hamas branches over a longer period of time, how will Netanyahu be able to eliminate the idea of armed resistance without reaching a political solution on the horizon?
- For more: Elrisala website and for social networking, you can follow us on Facebook
- Source of information and images “rosaelyoussef“
