Lindsay Clancy trial witness RESIGNS from hospital job hours after testifying against her
A psychiatrist who testified against Lindsay Clancy at her murder trial resigned from his hospital job hours after taking the stand.
Dr Avram Mack concluded that the 36-year-old was criminally responsible for killing her children after he interviewed her in April this year.
He told the jury on August 21 that the mother told each of her children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months, to ‘Go to God,’ as she strangled them with exercise bands in their Massachusetts home on January 24, 2023.
Mack then repeatedly clashed with defense attorney Kevin Reddington when he returned for cross-examination via Zoom on Monday.
That same day, Mack, 54, resigned from his role as a psychiatrist at Nemours Children’s Health in Delaware.
‘Dr Avram Mack is no longer employed by Nemours Children’s Health. He resigned on Monday, August 24,’ a hospital spokesperson told the Daily Mail.
It is unclear why Mack resigned. Calls and emails to the physician were not returned Friday.
Mack was hired by the prosecution to interview Clancy along with another doctor earlier this year at Tewksbury Hospital, where she is being held pending her verdict.
He determined that Clancy suffered ‘a major depressive episode’ but did not have psychosis, and insisted there were no signs of mania.
Dr Avram Mack resigned from his job at a children’s hospital after he testified that Lindsay Clancy is criminally responsible for killing her children
Clancy, 36, does not deny she killed her children, but has pleaded not guilty to murder by reason of insanity, citing postpartum psychosis
‘The deaths were done one by one in a way that was organized and tended to achieve a particular goal,’ Mack testified.
‘Her attempt at suicide was also organized in that it included as many methods as possible.’
The psychiatrist claimed Clancy showed that she had a decision-making capacity by asking to change her healthcare proxy from her then-husband Patrick to her parents.
Reddington sparred with Mack during his fiery cross-examination that lasted two days.
At one point, Reddington pointedly asked Mack: ‘Your area of interest is in adolescents who like to smoke weed and drink, isn’t it?’
‘No,’ the psychiatrist responded plainly.
Reddington then pressed Mack on whether he had ‘ever come within breathing distance of a pregnant woman.’
He challenged the psychiatrist’s experience with women, asking how many he had treated before appearing to accuse him of fabricating his testimony: ‘What, are you making this up?’
Mack, who testified on behalf of the state, repeatedly clashed with defense attorney Kevin Reddington during cross-examination
Mack testified that Clancy told each of her children – Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months – to ‘Go to God,’ as she strangled them on January 24, 2023
Lindsay Clancy: In court as the jury decides her fate
I’m Rachel Sharp, US Editor of The Crime Desk. I have been covering the Lindsay Clancy trial since Day One.
The Daily Mail will bring readers unrivalled coverage, reaction and analysis of the verdict in a special edition of The Crime Desk newsletter.
The 36-year-old faces life in prison for strangling her three children with an exercise band.
Sign up for free HERE to get the latest in a breaking news edition of the newsletter as the jury decides Clancy’s future in a case that could have far-reaching implications for how postpartum mental illness is treated in the criminal justice system.
Reddington turned the tables on the state’s witness by asking some of the same questions that the defense experts were asked by prosecutors.
He asked if Dr Mack had confirmatory bias – because the state contacted him as part of their efforts to push back on Clancy’s insanity defense. Mack insisted he did not.
Reddington also questioned him about how much money he makes as an expert witness.
The two men also got heated while discussing the DSM-5, a reference book for mental health professionals, and postpartum issues.
When asking him about postpartum psychosis, Mack referred to it as a ‘proposed’ symptom or disease.
Reddington walked up to the screen and raised his voice, asking: ‘Are you telling me you don’t believe or buy postpartum psychosis?
‘I’m not saying that at all,’ Mack answered.
At one point, Judge William Sullivan told Mack to answer Reddington’s questions.
Reddington pressed Dr Mack on whether he accepts that postpartum psychosis is a legitimate disease.
The expert could not seem to give a straight answer, instead he asked Reddington questions.
Sullivan interrupted and told Dr Mack to answer Reddington’s questions or to tell the judge the question needs to be rephrased.
‘Doctor, hold on. Here’s the way this works. You don’t really ask a lot of questions, you answer the questions,’ Sullivan said.
On the day he finished testifying, Mack, 54, resigned from his role as a psychiatrist at Nemours Children’s Health in Delaware
A Nemours spokesperson told the Daily Mail: ‘Dr Avram Mack is no longer employed by Nemours Children’s Health. He resigned on Monday, August 24’
Mack claimed Clancy suffered ‘a major depressive episode’ but did not have psychosis, and insisted there were no signs of mania
‘I told you before, if you can’t answer a question the way it is framed, just let me know and I’ll tell counsel to frame it in a different way.’
Clancy is on trial for the murders of her children after she strangled them with exercise bands and then allegedly attempted to kill herself, but her efforts failed and left her paralyzed.
She has admitted to killing her children but pleaded not guilty to murder by reason of insanity, citing postpartum psychosis, and is seeking to be committed to a state mental health facility rather than face a prison sentence.
The jury began deliberating on Thursday and did not deliver a verdict by end of day Friday.
