Trump stares down SCOTUS justices face-to-face as they criticize his ‘quirky’ plan to stop birthright citizenship – in a dramatic FIRST for a sitting President
Donald Trump made history Wednesday by becoming the first sitting president to attend Supreme Court oral arguments in person – only to watch conservative justices dismantle his administration’s case for ending birthright citizenship.
Already, the Justices, including some appointed by Trump, have expressed skepticism over the President’s team’s arguments in the case, Trump vs. Barbara.
Trump, wearing his iconic red tie, was in the front row of a public seating area roughly half a dozen rows behind the lectern from which US Solicitor General John Sauer is arguing on his behalf.
He was spotted sitting placidly with his hands resting in his lap.
Trump’s attendance marks the first time a sitting President has watched arguments in person, as the nine Justices weigh whether his executive order has legal merit. A ruling is expected in June or July.
The plaintiffs are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which has been arguing that the plain language of the 14th Amendment provides those born on US soil automatic birthright citizenship.
Birthright citizenship was enshrined by the 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868 to guarantee citizenship to freed slaves, but has since applied to every person born on US soil or its territories. Trump moved to end it by executive order on Inauguration Day 2025 – a move subsequently struck down by lower courts as unconstitutional.
In a blow to the President early on, Chief Justice John Roberts threw cold water on Sauer’s position, calling a key piece of his argument ‘quirky.’
People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court ahead of Trump’s expected arrival on April 01, 2026 in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara to determine if President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship is constitutional
Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office to crack down on birthright citizenship. The order has since been held up in court
The plaintiffs are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which plans on arguing that the plain language of the 14th Amendment provides those born on US soil automatic birthright citizenship
Shortly after, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was appointed by Trump, said the administration’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment introduces ‘a new kind of citizenship,’ signaling her skepticism of the President’s team’s argument.
‘Do you think Native Americans today are birthright citizens under your test?’ Justice Neil Gorsuch, who was also added to the bench by Trump, asked Sauer.
‘I think so,’ the Solicitor General responded tepidly. After Gorsuch asked Sauer again, he laughed and told Trump’s legal team: ‘I’ll take the yes.’
‘Are we bringing pregnant women in for depositions?’ Justice Kentaji Brown Jackson asked Sauer how the administration would determine the citizenship of newborn children.
Sauer suggested that social security numbers could be used to check.
Trump has long fixated on birth tourism – the practice of foreigners traveling to the US to give birth and secure citizenship for their children – arguing it is being unfairly exploited by wealthy foreign nationals.
‘Birthright Citizenship is not about rich people from China, and the rest of the World, who want their children, and hundreds of thousands more, FOR PAY, to ridiculously become citizens of the United States of America,’ Trump wrote in a separate post on Monday.
‘It is about the babies of slaves! We are the only Country in the World that dignifies this subject with even discussion. Look at the dates of this long ago legislation – The exact end of the Civil War!’
Trump rides in the Beast to the Supreme Court on Wednesday morning
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Congressman Jamie Raskin have filed an amicus brief against the Trump case, arguing the administration’s position violates ‘the Constitution and over a century of Supreme Court rulings, as well as laws enacted by Congress.’
A majority of Americans oppose ending birthright citizenship, according to a December poll from Quinnipiac.
Another survey from Washington Post-ABC News Ipsos from April 2025 found that 67 percent of US adults oppose ending it.
Trump’s executive order reinterprets the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause to exclude children born after February 19, 2025, to parents who are in the US illegally or on a temporary basis.
The case turns on a fundamental constitutional question: does the 14th Amendment guarantee citizenship to virtually everyone born on US soil, or can the President narrow the scope of its ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ clause?
Trump’s presence in the courtroom is certain to intensify the atmosphere, coming as it does after he has openly ridiculed the Justices for blocking his sweeping tariff agenda.
