Thousands of everyday snacks that face being BANNED in multiple states because their ingredients are linked to cancer – including Flamin’ Hot Cheetos, Lucky Charms and Gatorade

Bills advancing in multiple states could see ‘thousands’ of America’s favorite candies, snacks and sodas banned in their current form.

Last October California approved a historic ‘Skittles ban’ which outlawed four food additives linked to cancer, fertility issues and harm to the nervous system.

Now New York, Pennsylvania and Illinois have advanced similar measures, targeting a total of 13 additives banned in some European countries over alleged health risks.

New Jersey and Missouri are also considering the bans. If passed, they would force companies to change their recipes or face legal action.

Experts say the bans could change the look, taste and texture of some American favorites.

Brian Ronholm, director of food safety at Consumer Reports, a campaign group which has championed the bans, said: ‘There is no consumer confusion on this issue — they want these chemicals out of foods.

‘But when [consumers] see that the FDA has not been able to keep up with the latest research… they recognize that the states are the only ones trying to protect them from toxic food chemicals right now.’

He warned that thousands of food products including breakfast cereals, sweet treats and beverages could be impacted. 

California’s landmark ‘Skittles Ban’, set to go into force in January 2027, outlawed four food additives — brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, propylparaben and Red 3. 

Those ingredients have been banned in Europe for years due to their links to kidney, thyroid and gastrointestinal cancer and mood disorders.

The ban in California triggered the introduction of a series of similar bills in New York, Illinois, New Jersey, Missouri and Pennsylvania.

But some states are seeking to go even further than the Golden State. 

New York’s bill calls for azodicarbinamide, used in breads and other baked goods, and butylated hydroxyanisole, a preservative used in processed meats, to be banned.

And lawmakers in Pennsylvania are calling for multiple food colorings — Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1 and Blue 2 — to be outlawed, due to their links to hyperactivity in children. 

Several studies — including a 2021 review by the California Environmental Protection Agency — have suggested synthetic dyes can cause adverse behavior including inattentiveness, hyperactivity and restlessness.

Scientists suggest this may be because the dyes interfere with dopamine in the brain, according to some studies, a neurotransmitter associated with mood and behavior. 

‘They are linked to restlessness,’ Ronholm said, ‘so that’s pretty much the crux of the effort to try to get these synthetic dyes out of foods in children’.

‘These additives are introduced to children at an age where they are still developing, and when you introduce them at a young age… it really just increases their risk over time.’

Several studies in animals have also linked the additives to some cancers, including in the kidneys and blood.

Three of the dyes — Red 40, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 — can also be contaminated with benzene, a known carcinogen.

Ronholm added: ‘When you combine the fact that they are linked to certain types of cancers but then linked to behavioral difficulties, it really highlights the point that these are things that don’t belong in food because of the increased risk that it presents. That is the crux of the bill.’

California has introduced a bill aiming to ban all of the dyes — and Green 3 — from its schools.

Studies have also linked Green 3 to hyperactivity in children, which was likely behind the decision to also include this coloring.

But Chris Gindlesberg, from the National Confectioners Association, said that many studies linking the dyes to health effects had ‘blatant shortcomings’ and failed to prove a direct link.

Four of the five additives in Pennsylvania’s bill are already banned in some European countries, while one — Red 40 — can only be used in products if they agree to also carry a warning label.

Canada has not banned the food colorings listed in Pennsylvania and California’s bills, however, saying they were safe to use.

New York state’s bill also includes the additive titanium dioxide, which is used to add shine and brightness to colors — and found in many treats including Skittles and cupcakes.

It was included in California’s original bill but later withdrawn after lobbying from the dairy industry, which uses it to help give semi-skimmed milk a white color.

Bills in New York and California similarly sought to ban butylated hydroxyanisole, which has been linked to cancers in some animal studies.

It is used as a preservative in some butters, processed meats and baked goods to prevent the oils and fats within them from going rancid.

Campaigners say there is a ‘very good chance’ that at least some of the bills will pass.

They also pointed to bipartisan action, such as in Pennsylvania — where Democrats and Republicans are working together on bills.

But the opposition said bills for bans have already failed in several other states, including Indiana, Maryland, South Dakota and West Virginia.