Female teacher who tied young private school pupil to bed and blindfolded him for sex is jailed for seven years

A female teacher at a private school who blindfolded a pupil and tied him to her bed for sex has been jailed for seven years.

Deborah Franklin committed the offences against the boy in the early 1990s when she worked at the Hertfordshire preparatory school, where fees are now £18,000 a year.

Her victim told a trial how he first met the ‘gregarious’ teacher when he joined her class and she became his private tutor.

She then began grooming him, before drawing him into a ‘relationship’ that led to them having sex ‘dozens of times’.

Breaking down as he described one encounter on the bed in her home, the victim, who is now in his 40s, said: ‘She had a feather – some kind of feathery gloves and fur. She tickled me.

‘I remember being strapped down to the bed and blindfolded… I guess I had no clue as to what was happening. I went with it and trusted her.’

The case rested on the victim’s detailed and emotional testimony as the abuse was not reported at the time.

He told his father before his 13th birthday but no action was taken, as he wanted to ‘avoid causing a scene’ at his son’s bar mitzvah.

Details only came to light in 2024 when the former pupil learned Franklin, 65, was still teaching and ‘felt it was important to tell the police’ about the abuse.

The mother-of-one claimed not to remember him when first confronted by officers – despite numerous photos of them together, arm-in-arm and even holding hands on a school trip.

But a jury convicted her unanimously earlier this year of eight counts of gross indecency with a boy under 14 between 1991 and 1995.

The offences were committed when the maximum sentence for each count was only two years in jail.

The law changed in 1997, increasing the maximum to ten years, but Franklin was sentenced under the old tariff.

Jailing her today for seven years, Judge Kamran Choudhry told her she had committed a ‘profound abuse of trust’.

‘[The victim] was a child, you were his teacher, tutor, and trusted adult. Instead of guiding him, you abused that position for your own sexual gratification,’ he said.

‘He described your approach of introducing him to sexual activity as educational and teacher-like.’

He added: ‘The consequences of your abuse have been enduring for decades.’

Prosecutor Gavin Pottinger read an impact statement from the victim, who said the abuse had been a ‘constant shadow’ across his life, causing anxiety, OCD symptoms, and thoughts that he would be ‘better off dead’.

The statement said: ‘I was a confident child, I was a cheeky child, I have a loving family.

‘I want to cry for the boy I was and the childhood I lost.’

Franklin had arrived in the dock with a book, wearing a black jacket and white top. She sat motionless while listening to the statement. 

She was represented by Aisling Byrnes, who asked the judge to consider her client’s ‘exemplary character’ outside of the offences, as well as the ‘undoubted good’ that she had done as a teacher and her role as a ‘wonderful mother’, in the words of her ‘distraught’ daughter. 

In a recorded video interview played to the jury during the trial at St Albans Crown Court, the victim described how ‘very gregarious, high energy’ Franklin developed a friendship with him.

‘[There was] a lot of whispering, inside jokes, a lot of learning from her as you would from an older friend. She spoke about drugs, cigarettes, sex,’ he said. 

‘Very adult things I could not get outside of that. I was the perfect candidate. I was interested to know those types of things.’

According to the victim, who comes from a wealthy family, Franklin became increasingly embedded in his family life.

He described his abuser, who was in her 30s at the time of the offences, as ‘ever present’ in their large, detached suburban home and said she spent so much time there that he could still remember her telephone number decades later.

Mr Pottinger told the court that Franklin was ‘trusted’ by the family to be in the boy’s room during tutoring sessions. 

The turning point in their relationship came when he won a bet against Franklin at school and he suggested what he described as ‘something childish’ as his prize.

The defendant told him she was ‘very surprised’ at his request, adding: ‘I would have thought you wanted to see me without my clothes on.’

The first physical incident followed soon afterwards in a den created by his older brother in the family garage.

Franklin, who was wearing a summer dress, kissed her victim on the lips after asking: ‘Do you want to touch me?’

Describing the developing relationship, the former pupil said: ‘She was teaching me how to touch a woman…

‘I remember her just telling me what to do and I would just do it.’

He recalled one encounter where Franklin called out the name of her husband Angelo, a security firm boss.

‘It took me by surprise. I never saw their relationship. I thought I had the relationship. I remember thinking I had a competitor,’ he said.

Mr Pottinger told jurors sexual intercourse took place ‘dozens of times’, adding: ‘Whenever they were alone and they had an opportunity, they would carry out these acts.’

Franklin sometimes touched the boy in changing rooms when she took him swimming and occasionally engaged in sexual contact with him on school premises, although such incidents were rare and conducted ‘very, very cautious[ly,]’ according to the victim.

The complainant explained that he did not recognise the situation as abuse at the time, because he believed he was involved in a genuine relationship.

A key plank in the evidence against Franklin was that her victim had reported it to others long before he contacted police.

In addition to confessing to his father about what had happened, he revealed the abuse to a doctor and a girlfriend in the early 2000s.

Family members had also observed an unusually close relationship between teacher and pupil.

The victim’s brother remembered Franklin discussing sexual matters with him, while his sister recalled seeing the pair together in bed at the family home.

Photographs shown to the jury showed the defendant, of Radlett, Hertfordshire, with her hand over the complainant’s mouth, sitting on his bed, placing her arm around him and holding hands with him on a coach during a school trip.

Mr Pottinger told jurors that the relationship eventually ended when the complainant moved to another school.

Giving evidence, Franklin told the court it was common for teachers, parents and children to socialise. Her defence said the relationship was not ‘unusually close and inappropriate’. 

But the prosecution argued that the growing familiarity was part of a deliberate grooming process through which boundaries between teacher and pupil were eroded.

Franklin – who took a job with the RSPB after leaving teaching – widened her eyes as the guilty verdicts were read out by the jury forewoman in July but showed little other emotion.

An application for bail to ‘put her affairs in order’ was refused, with the judge pointing out there was a ‘high possibility of a custodial sentence’.

After the verdict, Hertfordshire Police Detective Constable Liz McGrath, who led the investigation, said: ‘I wish to commend the bravery shown by the victim in reporting the allegations to the police and for the strength shown during the trial.

‘This case demonstrates that however long ago a crime happened, we are committed to getting justice for victims.’

The force added in a statement: ‘Becoming a victim of sexual assault is never your fault. If you’ve been a victim, no matter how long ago the offence occurred, please report it.’

Franklin was also made the subject of a public protection order for ten years after release, requiring her to notify Public Protection about any paid or voluntary work.

A separate order also barred her from working with children.